基础理论研究2026年第40卷第5期《档案学研究》

档案利用服务中的人工智能应用及其信息自决权伦理考量

Artificial Intelligence Applications in Archives Services and Ethical Considerations of Informational Self-determination

黄霄羽, 姚静

HUANG Xiaoyu, YAO Jing

1 中国人民大学信息资源管理学院北京 100872 2 中国标准化研究院北京 100191

出版日期2026-10-28卷期第40卷第5期页码23-31DOI10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2026.05.003通讯作者姚静浏览次数0 次

查看 HTML 全文下载 PDF 全文期刊原文页

摘要

随着人工智能技术在档案利用服务中的应用，用户的信息获取方式发生变革，其信息自决权面临伦理挑战。首先，采用文献研究法、案例分析法、网络调查法，从操作层、认知层、生成层、决策层系统分析人工智能应用于档案服务中的关键要素。其次，剖析信息自决权伦理挑战，包括：剖析透明度与结果可解释性危机，同意失效、用途扩展与数据最小化失守，再识别风险与外部扩散，真实性、监督能力下降与补救渠道缺失，以及用户认知退化、行为引导与身份塑造。最后，提出应对策略：在认识论层面，树立档案利用服务价值理论与伦理框架；在方法论层面，遵循“Ethics by/in/for Design”的技术伦理逻辑；在实践论层面，在政策制定、治理框架、技术措施与监管评估等环节建立全流程协同路径。

关键词：档案利用服务信息自决权伦理挑战技术治理

Abstract

With the application of artificial intelligence technology in archives services, users' information access methods have undergone transformation, posing ethical challenges to their right to informational self-determination. First, employing literature research, case analysis, and online surveys, a systematic analysis of key elements in AI's application to archives services is conducted at operational, cognitive, generative, and decision-making levels. Second, the ethical challenges arising from the right to information self-determination are dissected, including: transparency and explainability crises, consent failure, purpose expansion and data minimization breaches, re-identification risks and external diffusion, declining authenticity and oversight capabilities with remedial channels, as well as user cognitive degradation, behavioral guidance, and identity shaping. Finally, countermeasures are proposed: at the epistemological level, establishing a value theory and ethical framework for archives services; at the methodological level, adhering to the "Ethics by/in/for Design" technological ethics logic; and at the practical level, creating a full-process collaborative path across policy formulation, governance frameworks, technical measure, and regulatory evaluation.

Key words: archives services; informational self-determination; ethical challenges; technological governance

引用格式

黄霄羽, 姚静. 档案利用服务中的人工智能应用及其信息自决权伦理考量[J]. 档案学研究, 2026, 40(5): 23-31.

HUANG Xiaoyu, YAO Jing. Artificial Intelligence Applications in Archives Services and Ethical Considerations of Informational Self-determination. Archives Science Study, 2026, 40(5): 23-31.

参考文献

展开查看参考文献（49 条）

[1] 中华人民共和国司法部. 一图速览2025年政府工作报告[EB/OL].(2025-03-05)[2025-03-09]. https://www.moj.gov.cn/pub/sfbgw/gwxw/ttxg/202503/t20250305_515253.html. [2] 中华人民共和国中央人民政府. 国务院印发《关于深入实施“人工智能＋”行动的意见》(2025-08-26)[2025-08-27]. https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/liebiao/202508/content_7037868.htm. [3] Saran S, Natarajan N, Srikumar M. In pursuit of autonomy: AI and national strategies[EB/OL].(2025-10-11)[2026-05-14]. https://www.academia.edu/43184216/In_Pursuit_of_Autonomy_AI_and_National_Strategies. [4] 吉雯璇, 曹航. 人工智能视域下非遗档案资源开发利用研究[J]. 档案, 2024(7):18. [5] 杜霞. 人工智能技术在企业档案管理中的应用场景,模式创新与未来展望[J]. 山西档案, 2024(5):152. [6] 刘越男, 钱毅, 王平, 等. 挑战与展望:DeepSeek对档案工作的影响及应用前景[J]. 浙江档案, 2025(2):5. [7] Riva G, Tiribelli S. Moral and legal autonomy in the era of artificial intelligence[J]. S&F Scienzaefilosofia.it., 2022(28):166-202. [8] Sankaran S, Markopoulos P. "It's like a puppet master": user perceptions of personal autonomy when interacting with intelligent technologies[C]// Masthoff J, Herder E, Tintarev N. Proceedings of the 29th ACM conference on user modeling, adaptation and personalization. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021: 108-118. [9] De Terwangne C. The right to be forgotten and informational autonomy in the digital environment[M]//Pereira A G, Ghezzi A, Vesnic-Alujevic L. The ethics of memory in a digital age: interrogating the right to be forgotten. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2014: 82. [10] 施鹏鹏. 论大数据侦查:以信息自决权为主线[J]. 法治研究, 2024(6):15. [11] 姚岳绒. 论信息自决权作为一项基本权利在我国的证成[J]. 政治与法律, 2012(4):72. [12] 赵宏. 信息自决权在我国的保护现状及其立法趋势前瞻[J]. 中国法律评论, 2017(1):147. [13] 贺小石. 互联网时代个人信息自决权研究[J]. 编辑学刊, 2020(3):42. [14] 刘艳红. 民法编纂背景下侵犯公民个人信息罪的保护法益:信息自决权—以刑民一体化及《民法总则》第111条为视角[J]. 浙江工商大学学报, 2019(6):20. [15] 赵峰, 喻斯瑶, 王金成. 现代侦查行为中“大数据”的应用风险研究—以信息自决权为视角[J]. 法制博览, 2015(31):1. [16] 何异之, 宋凡. 大数据时代信息自决权保护的困境与纾解[J]. 衡阳师范学院学报, 2025(2):53. [17] 黄琴. 论大数据背景下的个人信息自决权—由“大数据杀熟”引发的思考[J]. 宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版), 2024(3):108. [18] 王兴芳. 生成式人工智能情境下档案用户信息行为变化:特点、问题与趋势[J]. 档案管理, 2025(1):68. [19] 陈研. 人工智能在电子档案分类与检索中的应用研究[J]. 兰台世界, 2025(1):79. [20] [39] 黄钟雨. 生成式人工智能嵌入档案知识服务的伦理风险:表征、归因及应对[J]. 档案, 2024(11):60. [21] 李诺, 陆阳. 档案领域应用人工智能的伦理风险及其治理—基于行动者网络理论的探讨[J]. 山西档案, 2024(9):38. [22] 付永华, 张文欣, 司俊勇. ChatGPT影响下的人工智能档案服务:突破与挑战[J]. 档案管理, 2023(3):58. [23] 李哲, 王可, 王彪, 等. 人机融合智能决策:概念、框架与应用[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2025(10):3439. [24] Stanford University Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence index report 2025[EB/OL].(2025-02-02)[2025-10-28]. https://hai.stanford.edu/assets/files/hai_ai_index_report_2025.pdf. [25] Parasuraman R, Sheridan T B, Wickens C D. A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans, 2000(3): 286-297. [26] Thevenet A. Swedish National Archives releases open Software for handwritten document transcription[EB/OL].(2025-03-03)[2025-07-08]. https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/collection/open-source-observatory-osor/news/swedish-national-archives-releases-os-htrocr. [27] Riikka M, Sanna J, Mikko L, et al. Handwritten text recognition (HTR)model for historical documents from 17th to 20th centuries-using TrOCR[EB/OL].(2025-01-14)[2025-06-02]. https://kansallisarkisto.fi/documents/141232930/153230445/poster_joensuu_202411_final+1.pdf/4d75cc58-d36d-7fac-bbb5-91e5e547ea43/poster_joensuu_202411_final+1.pdf?t=1736927900122. [28] NARA. National Archives' new strategic framework emphasizes building capacity through responsible use of Artificial Intelligence Facebook Twitter[EB/OL].(2024-10-17)[2025-05-19]. https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/new-strategic-framework-artificial-intelligence. [29] NIST. AI risk management framework[EB/OL].(2023-01-26)[2025-10-28]. https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework. [30] 胡志斌, 李鹏达, 罗贤明. 江西:档案大数据分析应用[J]. 中国档案, 2023(8):28. [31] OECD. OECD framework for the classification of AI systems[EB/OL].(2022-02-01)[2025-10-28]. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2022/02/oecd-framework-for-the-classification-of-ai-systems_336a8b57/cb6d9eca-en.pdf. [32] Roddenberry Entertainment. "The Archive" star trek spatial experience released for Apple Vision Pro[EB/OL].(2024-02-07)[2025-08-31]. https://trekmovie.com/2024/02/07/the-archive-star-trek-spatial-experience-released-for-apple-vision-pro/. [33] NIST. Artificial Intelligence risk management framework(AI RMF1. 0)[EB/OL].(2023-08-17)[2025-10-28]. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ai/nist.ai.100-1.pdf. [34] 黄钰姣. 兴业银行启动全国首单企业集团数字档案科技合作[EB/OL].(2024-11-05)[2025-10-01]. https://local.cctv.com/2024/11/05/ARTIf2L2ySyg04lb8kUb8Yw0241105.shtml. [35] Doshi-Velez F, Kim B.Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning[PP/OL]. v2.arXiv(2017-03-02)[2026-05-14].https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08608. DOI:10.48550/arXiv.1702.08608. [36] Slashdot Media. National Archives pushes Google Gemini AI on employees[EB/OL].(2024-10-15)[2025-04-18]. https://tech.slashdot.org/story/24/10/15/1553228/national-archives-pushes-google-gemini-ai-on-employees. [37] Anthropic. Rashtrapati Bhavan's photo archive gets AI boost[EB/OL].(2024-10-23)[2025-04-24]. https://www.anthropic.-com/customers/european-parliament. [38] Indian Ministry of Culture. Digitization of records Of National Archives[EB/OL].(2024-08-01)[2024-09-24]. https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=2040117. [39] Schlosser K. 80 years after D-Day, Microsoft uses AI to enhance archival materials and keep memories alive[EB/OL].(2024-06-04)[2025-07-17]. https://www.geekwire.com/2024/80-years-after-d-day-microsoft-uses-ai-to-enhance-archival-materials-and-keep-memories-alive/. [40] 覃柳玮, 魏涵玉. AI助力,智慧档案让沉睡的文件活起来[EB/OL].(2024-05-12)[2025-10-04]. https://www.wust.edu.cn/info/1581/420862.htm. [41] Catena E, Tummolini L, Santucci V G. Human autonomy with AI in the loop[J]. Philosophical Psychology, 2026(3): 941-968. [42] Grafanaki S. Autonomy challenges in the age of big data[J]. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, 2016(27): 803. [43] Jaillant L, Rees A. Applying AI to digital archives: trust, collaboration and shared professional ethics[J]. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 2023(2): 571-585. [44] 新华社. 发展负责任的人工智能:我国新一代人工智能治理原则发布[EB/OL].[2025-06-18]. https://www.cac.gov.cn/2019-06/17/c_1124634614.htm. [45] Gharib M. Towards a heuristic model for usable privacy[C]//Araújo J, de la Vara J L, Condori-Fernández N, et al. Joint Proceedings of RCIS 2024 Workshops and Research Projects Track co-located with the 18th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science(RCIS 2024). Guimarães, Portugal: CEUR-WS.org, 2024: 1-10. [46] Dignum V. Ethics in artificial intelligence: introduction to the special issue[J]. Ethics and Information Technology, 2018(1): 1-3. [47] 宁宣凤, 吴涵, 方禹. 北京互联网法院个人信息及数据纠纷典型案例解读[EB/OL].(2024-11-11)[2025-08-23]. https://www.kwm.com/cn/zh/insights/latest-thinking/interpretation-on-typical-personal-information-and-data-dispute-cases-released-by-beijing-internet-court.html. [48] 杨清望, 唐乾. 生成式人工智能赋能新质生产力的隐私风险及协同治理[J]. 科技与法律(中英文), 2025(3):70. [49] Kovac M. Autonomous artificial intelligence and uncontemplated hazards: towards the optimal regulatory framework[J]. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2022(1): 94-113.