文件构成要素思想的历史考察与当代审思

Historical Examination and Contemporary Reflection on the Thought of Constituent Elements of Records

龙家庆

LONG Jiaqing

中国人民大学信息资源管理学院北京 100872

出版日期2026-10-28卷期第40卷第5期页码13-22DOI10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2026.05.002浏览次数0 次

查看 HTML 全文下载 PDF 全文期刊原文页

摘要

文件构成要素思想史研究聚焦“文件如何构成”这一元问题，本质在于为理解复杂文档现象提供一种方法论。通过对文件构成的内部逻辑与外部环境进行双重考察，揭示文件构成要素思想的演化脉络，包括“两分法”“三要素观”“四要素说”“五要素模板”等不同阶段。比较分析表明，其共性规律体现在：文件构成始终涉及若干要素之间的组合搭配，要素体系深化节点在于记录载体的变革，要素思想演变主要受管理需求所驱动，而文件载体差异对文件特质呈现的影响趋于弱化。有必要从理论价值与实践功能等方面加以审视，既要深刻把握其思想实质并做出动态阐释，也应强化文件管控过程中的证据追溯，以支撑面向档案业务场景的具体要素分析。

关键词：档案思想史文件构成要素新来源观证据价值

Abstract

The research on the intellectual history of the constituent elements of records focuses on the fundamental question of how records are constituted, the essence of which is to provide a methodology for understanding complex archival phenomena. By examining both the internal logic and external context of record composition, this study traces the evolution of thinking on constituent elements of records, including binary model, three-element view, four-element theory, and five-element template. The comparative analysis reveals several common patterns: record constitution consistently involves the combination and configuration of multiple elements; the deepening of element frameworks is closely linked to transformations in recording media; the evolution of the elements of thought is primarily driven by management needs; and the influence of media differences on the distinctive characteristics of records has gradually weakened. It is necessary to examine this issue from the perspectives of theoretical value and practical function. This entails clarifying its conceptual foundations through dynamic interpretation while strengthening evidential traceability in the process of recordkeeping, so as to support concrete element-based analysis in archival practice scenarios.

Key words: archival intellectual history; constituent elements of records; the new theory of provenance; evidential value

引用格式

龙家庆. 文件构成要素思想的历史考察与当代审思[J]. 档案学研究, 2026, 40(5): 13-22.

LONG Jiaqing. Historical Examination and Contemporary Reflection on the Thought of Constituent Elements of Records. Archives Science Study, 2026, 40(5): 13-22.

参考文献

展开查看参考文献（40 条）

[1] Cook T. What is past is prologue: a history of archival ideas since 1898, and the future paradigm shift[J]. Archivaria, 1997(1): 17. [2] 冯惠玲, 刘越男. 电子文件管理教程:2版[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社,2017:6-8. [3] [23][34]龙家庆. 档案学视角下“背景”(Context)的概念、构成与功能[J]. 档案学通讯, 2024(3):54,59. [4] Ghosh S S, Chatterjee S K. Synthesizing constituents for knowledge organization and representation from historical travel records[J]. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 2025(1): 1. [5] [42]McKemmish S, Piggott M, Reed B, et al. Archives: Recordkeeping in society[M]. Wagga Wagga, N.S.W.: Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University, 2005: 128-129. [6] Bearman D A, Lytle R H. The power of the principle of provenance[J]. Archivaria, 1985(1): 14. [7] 连志英. 一种新范式:文件连续体理论的发展及应用[J]. 档案学研究, 2018(1):18. [8] 冯惠玲, 加小双. 档案后保管理论的演进与核心思想[J]. 档案学通讯, 2019(4):4. [9] McDonald J. Managing records in the modern office: taming the wild frontier[J]. Archivaria, 1995(1): 76. [10] 冯惠玲, 何嘉荪. 全宗理论的实质—全宗理论新探之二[J]. 档案学通讯, 1988(5):10. [11] 冯惠玲. 拥有新记忆—电子文件管理研究[D]. 北京: 中国人民大学,1997:16-19. [12] 何嘉荪, 傅荣校. 文件运动规律研究[M]. 北京: 中国档案出版社,1999:113. [13] 张斌, 杨文. 建构中国自主的档案学知识体系[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2023(2):41. [14] 王荣江. 库恩与科学史[J]. 自然辩证法通讯, 2016(5):128. [15] T.R.谢伦伯格. 现代档案—原则与技术[M]. 黄坤坊,等,译. 北京: 档案出版社,1983:18-21. [16] [28]王英玮, 陈智为, 刘越男. 档案管理学:5版[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社,2021:13-14,119-120. [17] 黄霄羽. 核心概念宜立边界,支柱理论方护根基—“来源观”的演变及其特点和影响评价[J]. 档案学通讯, 2014(5):23. [18] [26]刘新安. 档案物质实体的双重构成[J]. 档案学通讯, 2003(5):10. [19] 周耀林, 赵跃, 姬荣伟. “三个体系”视角下档案管理研究框架的重构[J]. 档案学研究, 2017(4):8. [20] Bearman D. Archival strategies[J]. The american archivist, 1995(4): 384, 389. [21] Duranti L. Diplomatics: new uses for an old science, Part Ⅰ[J]. Archivaria, 1989(1): 7. [22] International Council on Archives. ICA study: guide for managing electronic records from an archival perspective[EB/OL].(2024-06-09)[2025-11-09]. https://www.ica.org/resource/ica-study-n8-guide-for-managing-electronic-records-from-an-archival-perspective/. [23] 特里·库克. 电子文件与纸质文件观念:后保管及后现代主义社会里信息与档案管理中面临的一场革命[J]. 刘越男,译. 山西档案, 1997(2):11. [24] 何嘉荪, 史习人, 章燕华. 后保管时代档案学基础理论研究—简评文件构成要素论[J]. 档案学研究, 2010(1):6. [25] 刘越男. 文件档案管理的数字转型之路[Z/OL].(2020-04-16)[2026-05-12]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=VrduTR4bJX48nhamjBG7DsUNHzopIoQvAOE0wQWacUV3LtEPzR9KcohYousJ4qTwroQdzlX9vnsd_fmnvH3ZXTEUvKaLkenEHBqs4dQap9RwwY-8Gm9FJPYggh-tHVaf_FeLWrTZnBe9i-PJmzv-HHGjs_vlzZXQ&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS. [26] 梁继红. 档案学视野中的古文书学:西方经验与中国路径鸟瞰[J]. 档案学通讯, 2024(3):67. [27] InterPARES 2 Project. Terminology database[EB/OL].(2013-06-08)[2024-04-20]. http://www.interpares.org/ip2/ip2_terminology_db.cfm. [28] Duranti L. The archival bond[J]. Archives and museum informatics, 1997(3): 213. [29] 杨鹏, 金波. 档案数据要素赋能新质生产力发展的“理”与“路”[J]. 档案学研究, 2025(2):4. [30] 钱毅. 技术变迁环境下档案对象管理空间演化初探[J]. 档案学通讯, 2018(2):10. [31] 经过文件构成要素体系优化后,建议将“管控过程要素”单列为一大要素,它与背景、内容与结构并列. [32] Hurley C, Provenance P. What, if anything, is archival description?[J]. Archves and Manuscripts, 2005(1): 110. [33] 龙家庆. 澳大利亚文件系列体系的历史演进、思想内核与当代镜鉴[J]. 档案学研究, 2025(4):135. [34] International Council on Archives. Records in contexts(RiC)[EB/OL].(2024-11-23)[2025-12-15]. https://www.ica.org/ica-network/expert-groups/egad/records-in-contexts-ric/. [35] 连志英, 苏立. 档案学视角下算法来源的内涵及其要素构成[J]. 档案学通讯, 2025(3):29. [36] 中华人民共和国中央人民政府. 国务院办公厅关于加快场景培育和开放推动新场景大规模应用的实施意见[EB/OL].(2025-11-07)[2025-12-12]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/202511/content_7047419.htm. [37] 古琬莹, 吴建华. 基于管控视角的口述档案采集规范化研究[J]. 档案学研究, 2020(1):87. [38] 特里·库克. 四个范式:欧洲档案学的观念和战略的变化—1840年以来西方档案观念与战略的变化[J]. 李音,译. 档案学研究, 2011(3):85. [39] Andresen H. A discussion frame for explaining records that are based on algorithmic output[J]. Records Management Journal, 2020(2): 129. [40] Cameron S, Franks P, Hamidzadeh B. Positioning paradata: a conceptual frame for AI processual documentation in archives and recordkeeping contexts[J]. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 2023(4): 1.