档案法规标准2018年第32卷第6期《档案学研究》
法律法规中档案及其属概念界定方法探讨
Discussion on the definition method of Archives and its generic concept in laws and regulations
1 郑州大学信息管理学院 郑州 450001 2 濮阳市档案局 濮阳 4750004
摘要
梳理法律法规中档案及文件、记录、数据等属概念界定的方法,认为现行《档案法》《档案法实施办法》中的档案与档案属概念及其具体所指事物之间的范围并不契合,而《〈中华人民共和国档案法〉修订草案(送审稿)》界定档案的方法较好地解决了这一问题。事实证明,法律法规中运用举例型档案概念界定方法比运用定义式档案概念界定方法更为符合立法技术规范和社会现实需要。同时,不应要求其他法律法规中的档案概念与《档案法》中的档案概念完全相同,而应采取归纳、提炼和概括的方法,使其更加符合规范对象的实际,从而不断丰富档案法律体系中档案概念的内涵。
Abstract
Combing the definition methods of the archives, documents, records, data and other generic concept of archives in the laws and regulations. It is considered that the concept of archives and its generic concept in the present“Archives Law”and the“Measures for the implementation of the Archives Law”are not in accord with the scope of specific things they refer to. However the method of defining archives in the“Revised draft of the Archives Law of the people’s Republic of China (submitted for review) ”has solved this problem well. It has been proved that the method of defining the concept of illustrative archives in laws and regulations is more in line with the legislative technical specifications and social reality needs than the method of defining the concept of the definition of archives. At the same time, the concept of archives in other laws and regulations should not be exactly the same as the concept of archives in the Archives Law, but should adopt the method of induction, extraction and generalization to make it more in line with the reality of the normative object. In order to enrich the concept of archives in the legal system.
引用格式
参考文献


