关怀版

基础理论研究2026年第40卷第4期《档案学研究》

档案价值鉴定理论范式的三重转向:基于文献的系统性述评

Triple Turns of Archival Appraisal Theoretical Paradigms: A Systematic Literature Review

蒋冠, 翟媛媛

JIANG Guan, ZHAI Yuanyuan

1 天津师范大学管理学院 天津 300387 2 上海大学文化遗产与信息管理学院 上海 200444

出版日期2026-08-28卷期第40卷 第4期页码31-39DOI10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2026.04.004浏览次数0

摘要

基于文献内容分析,系统梳理国内外档案价值鉴定理论范式转向的脉络,并围绕“如何鉴定”“由谁鉴定”“留存什么”三大主题展开系统性述评。研究发现:在鉴定标准维度,研究逻辑呈现从“实体论”“职能论”向“关系论”的转型趋势;在鉴定主体维度,经历了从单一权威向多元主体协同的深刻变革,且引发了对权力结构的深度反思;在保存范围维度,学术视角从证据范式向记忆范式转型,重点关注为主动建构社会记忆而留存档案。在此基础上,从构建本土化理论体系、应对数字时代智能鉴定挑战、服务国家战略导向三个方面,展望该领域未来研究方向,以期为档案价值鉴定的理论发展与实践创新提供参考。

关键词:档案价值档案鉴定社会记忆

Abstract

Based on literature content analysis, this paper systematically sorts out the evolutionary context of the theoretical paradigm shift in archival value appraisal at home and abroad, and conducts a systematic review around the three core themes of "how to appraise", "who undertakes appraisal", and "what to preserve". The research findings indicate that, in terms of appraisal criteria, the research logic shows a transformative trend from substantialism and functionalism toward relationalism; in the dimension of appraisal subjects, a profound transition has taken place from a single authoritative body to the collaboration of multiple subjects, triggering in-depth reflections on the power structure; from the perspective of preservation scope, the academic viewpoint has evolved from the evidence paradigm to the memory paradigm, with an increasing focus on preserving archives for the active construction of social memory. On this basis, this paper prospects the future research directions of this field from three aspects: constructing a localized theoretical system, addressing the challenges of intelligent appraisal in the digital era, and aligning with national strategic orientation, so as to provide references for the theoretical development and practical innovation of archival value appraisal.

Key words: archival value; archival appraisal; social memory

引用格式

蒋冠, 翟媛媛. 档案价值鉴定理论范式的三重转向:基于文献的系统性述评[J]. 档案学研究, 2026, 40(4): 31-39.
JIANG Guan, ZHAI Yuanyuan. Triple Turns of Archival Appraisal Theoretical Paradigms: A Systematic Literature Review. Archives Science Study, 2026, 40(4): 31-39.

参考文献

展开查看参考文献(78 条)
[1] 张斌. 关于档案价值鉴定的理论与实践(七)—鉴定活动论:鉴定标准与价值判断[J]. 档案学通讯, 2002(1):22. [2] Cook T, Schwartz J M. Archives, records, and power: from(postmodern)theory to(archival)performance[J]. Archival Science, 2002(3-4): 171-185. [3] [4] 韩玉梅, 黄霄羽. 外国档案管理自学指导[J]. 档案学通讯, 1998(6):73. [4] [45] T. R. 谢伦伯格. 现代档案—原则与技术[M]. 黄坤坊,等, 译. 北京: 档案出版社,1983:22,36-40. [5] 张斌. 论档案价值鉴定标准体系[J]. 中国档案, 2000(4):41. [6] 陈忠海. 欧美现代档案鉴定理论的历史发展及启示[J]. 档案学通讯, 2000(2):10-11. [7] 李媛媛, 桑毓域. 汉斯·布姆斯及其社会分析和职能鉴定理论探析[J]. 档案学通讯, 2014(5):29. [8] 汪孔德. 关于宏观职能鉴定论的理性思[J]. 档案与建设, 2004(4):18. [9] Jonker A E. Macroappraisal in the Netherlands. The First Ten Years, 1991-2001, and Beyond[J]. Archival Science, 2005(2): 203-218. [10] Cunningham A, Oswald R. Some Functions are more equal than others: the development of a macroappraisal strategy for the national archives of Australia[J]. Archival Science, 2005(2): 163-184. [11] Giesbrecht R, Smith J M. Everything old is new again: the evolution of Generic Appraisal at Library and Archives Canada[J]. Archivaria, 2017(1): 37-59. [12] Kim Y. A study on public records appraisal policies in the digital age: based on the case of The National Archives in the UK[J]. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 2019(62): 5-39. [13] 王琳, 赵彦昌. 21世纪以来档案鉴定研究述评—基于7种核心期刊的学术考察[J]. 档案学刊, 2022(3):8. [14] [17][20][21] 汪孔德. 档案价值鉴定研究[M]. 合肥: 安徽大学出版社,2009:81,85-86,87-92,93-95. [15] 陈兆祦, 和宝荣. 档案管理学基础[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社,1996:180-182. [16] 张斌. 档案价值论[M]. 北京: 中央文献出版社,2000:1-14. [17] 傅荣校. 档案鉴定理论与实践透视:基于效益与效率思路的研究[M]. 北京: 中国档案出版社,2007:63-99. [18] 汪孔德. 论档案鉴定的本位原则[J]. 档案学研究, 2003(5):15. [19] 杨茜茜. 档案鉴定理论体系重构探析—基于我国档案鉴定概念演变的思考[J]. 档案学通讯, 2018(5):28-29. [20] Mojapelo M, Maleka J. The electronic records appraisal approach: a case study of the construction education and training authority[J]. Mousaion: South African Journal of Information Studies, 2023(1): 1. [21] Anderson B, Eaton F, Schwartz S W. Archival appraisal and the digital record: applying past tradition for future practice[J]. New Review of Information Networking, 2015(1-2): 3-15. [22] Seol M W, Kim Y. Revisiting archical appraisal theories for their application to community archives[J]. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 2016(48): 210-252. [23] Lambert J. The management team and archival appraisal[J]. Archivaria, 2005(59): 109-117. [24] Makhlouf Shabou B, Tièche J, Knafou J, et al. Algorithmic methods to explore the automation of the appraisal of structured and unstructured digital data[J]. Records Management Journal, 2020(2): 175-200. [25] Bayeck R Y, Colavizza G, Bunn J, et al. Recommendations on using artificial intelligence in archival appraisal and selection[J]. Liverpool University Press, 2022(1): 219-225. [26] Sherman J, Morrison R, Klein L, et al. The power of absence: thinking with archival theory in algorithmic design[J]. Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 2024: 214-223. [27] Cox R J. Appraisal and the future of archives in the digital era[M]// Hill J. The future of archives and recordkeeping:a Reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011: 213-237. [28] 马伏秋. 论我国档案鉴定工作之“销毁鉴定”[J]. 档案学研究, 2015(4):85. [29] 周林兴, 邓晋芝. 错位的价值判定应该被纠正—对档案鉴定及销毁的历史视域考量[J]. 档案学通讯, 2015(2):38. [30] 杨冬权. 档案价值鉴定[J]. 中国档案, 2017(10):27. [31] 杨冬权. 从“选时代”到“全时代”—智慧社会档案工作的历史性转折[J]. 中国档案, 2021(1):77-79. [32] 马仁杰. 关于档案价值鉴定的若干问题[J]. 安徽大学学报, 1997(4):73-74. [33] 谢诗艺. 回归与反思—对档案鉴定的多维视角认识兼与周林兴教授商榷[J]. 档案学通讯, 2015(4):15. [34] 孙大东. 档案鉴定的历史和现实视域考量—与周林兴、邓晋芝二位作者商榷[J]. 档案学通讯, 2015(5):15-17. [35] 王增强. 理论与实践:档案存毁之间并无博弈—与周林兴、吕维商榷[J]. 档案学研究, 2017(2):22-23. [36] 周林兴. 档案价值是负载于档案的一种社会关系[J]. 山西档案, 2022(2):1. [37] [62] 周林兴. 漏斗式档案价值判定模型构建—一种基于社会关系的价值认知方法[J]. 浙江档案, 2025(1):26,27. [38] [63] 娄海婷. 对漏斗式档案价值判定模型及其应用的辩疑—兼与周林兴教授商榷[J]. 浙江档案, 2025(9):29-31,30. [39] Jennkinson H. A manual of archive administration[M]. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1992: 150-156. [40] Tschan R, 蔡娜, 吴开平. 詹金逊和谢伦伯格鉴定观之比较[J]. 档案与建设, 2005(1):19. [41] [56] 刘东斌. 档案鉴定—由谁鉴定—档案鉴定基本问题思考之二[J]. 档案管理, 2006(3):25-26, 26. [42] Ellington J K, Wilson M A. The performance appraisal milieu: a multilevel analysis of context effects in performance ratings[J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2017(1): 87-100. [43] Cook T. We are what we keep; we keep what we are: archival appraisal past, present and future[J]. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 2011(2): 173-189. [44] Lee K R. The distribution of responsibility and authority upon public record appraisal: focused on "Citizen Participation Appraisal"[J]. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 2019(60): 49-88. [45] Bayhylle R E. Tribal archives: a study in records, memory and power[D]. Los Angeles: University of California, 2011: 195-208. [46] Hodge S, Nantel S, Trainor C. Remnants of Jenkinson: observations on settler archival theory in Canadian archival appraisal discourse[J]. Archives and Records, 2022(2): 147-160. [47] Shilton K, Srinivasan R. Participatory appraisal and arrangement for multicultural archival collections[J]. Archivaria, 2007(1): 87-101. [48] Sucha-Xaya N. Finding values, building communities: development of an archival appraisal system for the Thai public sector[J]. Archival Science, 2024(3): 329-349. [49] 张纳昕. 档案宏观职能鉴定理论中的公民观阐释[J]. 档案与建设, 2023(1):57-58. [50] [57] 谭彩敏. 新时期档案价值鉴定研究:背景、标准、主体[J]. 北京档案, 2019(12):27-28,27. [51] 孔维冲. 档案价值鉴定标准体系的构建[J]. 中国档案, 2023(6):66. [52] 陈勇, 谢晓平. 德尔菲法在档案价值鉴定中的应用[J]. 中国档案, 2009(12):37-39. [53] Lin S K. A study on the appraisal of archival values for electronic records[J]. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 2010(2): 35-42. [54] 杨沩杰. 数智时代下档案价值鉴定工作:存续逻辑、多维拓展与路径重构[J]. 浙江档案, 2025(9):28. [55] 杨千, 李星玥. 数字时代档案鉴定非必要论辨析与匡正[J]. 档案学通讯, 2023(1):50. [56] Edquist S. The politics of archival appraisal in Sweden in the digital age[M]// BakG, RostgaardM. The Nordic Model of Digital Archiving. London: Routledge, 2023: 42-59. [57] [77] Schwartz J M, Cook T. Archives, records, and power: the making of modern memory[J]. Archival Science, 2002(1): 1-19. [58] Harris V. The archival sliver: power, memory, and archives in South Africa[J]. Archival Science, 2002(1): 63-86. [59] 何小菡. 论权力与档案鉴定的相互建构[J]. 档案, 2020(2):10. [60] [85] 徐拥军, 张群群, 卢思佳. 档案记忆观视角下档案工作者角色定位的反思[J]. 档案学研究, 2025(4):6,8. [61] 丁华东, 余黎菁. 论特里·库克的档案记忆思想[J]. 档案管理, 2014(6):7-8. [62] [76] Greene M A. The power of meaning: the archival mission in the Postmodern Age[J]. The American Archivist, 2002(1): 42-55. [63] 徐欣欣, 周冉瑶. 社群范式下对档案概念的新思考[J]. 档案学刊, 2024(3):8-11. [64] 陈智为. 档案社会学概论[M]. 天津: 南开大学出版社,1989:13. [65] Cook T. Evidence, memory, identity, and community: four shifting archival paradigms[J]. Archival Science, 2013(2): 95-120. [66] Duranti L, Franks P C. Encyclopedia of archival science[M]. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2015: 321-322. [67] Garaba F. The state of archival appraisal practices in the ESARBICA Region[J]. African Journal of Library Archives & Information Science, 2007(1): 59-63. [68] T. 库克. 铭记未来—档案在建构社会记忆中的作用[J]. 李音,译. 档案学通讯, 2002(2):75. [69] 闫静, 刘洋洋. 档案中的认同悖论—兼论档案对身份认同的作用机制与机理[J]. 档案与建设, 2021(3):11-14. [70] Samuels H. Who controls the past[J]. The American archivist, 1986(2): 109-124. [71] Hackman L, Warnow-Blewett J. The documentation strategy process: a model and a case study[J]. American Archivist, 1987(1): 12-47. [72] 于华. 馆藏珍贵档案鉴定原则[J]. 中国档案, 2016(1): 43. [73] Ketelaar E. Archival temples, archival prisons: modes of power and protection[J]. Archival Science, 2002(3): 221-238. [74] 周林兴, 吕维. 价值与认知:档案存毁之间的博弈[J]. 档案学通讯, 2016(5):32. [75] 周林兴. 重申弱化档案价值鉴定的合理性存在[J]. 档案学通讯, 2016(2):32. [76] Kretzschmar R. Archival appraisal in Germany: a decade of theory, strategies, and practices[J]. Archival Science, 2005(2): 219-238. [77] Warren K E. We need these bodies, but not their knowledge: black women in the archival science professions and their connection to the archives of enslaved black women in the French Antilles[J]. Library Trends, 2016(4): 776-794. [78] Harris V. Antonyms of our remembering[J]. Archival Science, 2014(3): 215-229.