概念、意义与实践：档案与数字人文的双向考察

Conception, Significance and Practice: A Bidirectional Examination of Archives and Digital Humanities

曲春梅, 何紫璇

Chunmei QU,Zixuan HE

1 山东大学历史文化学院济南 250100 2 中国人民大学档案事业发展研究中心北京 100872

出版日期2022-12-28卷期第36卷第6期页码10-17DOI10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2022.06.002

查看 HTML 全文下载 PDF 全文期刊原文页

摘要

档案与数字人文之间的关系日益密切。档案知识服务与档案价值阐释是数字人文理念与技术应用于档案领域的代表性场景，数字人文能增强档案知识服务的技术刚性，延展档案价值阐释的人文柔性。档案化管理能帮助实现数字人文资源对象的全过程管理，保障数字资源的完整性与可用性;维护背景联系有助于构建资源信任，拓展数字人文的价值空间。数字记忆是记忆在数字时代的一种新形态，体现了档案与数字人文在人文—记忆之维与数字—叙事之维的融合共生。从档案与数字人文的双向视角考察二者相互的概念理解、价值意义，分析二者相互建构的实践路径，有助于推动档案与数字人文之间的学科对话，促进学科发展。

Abstract

The relationship between archive and digital humanities is becoming increasingly close. Archival knowledge service and archival value interpretation are representative scenarios of digital humanities principles and technologies applied to the archival field. Digital humanities can enhance the technical rigidity of archival knowledge service and extend the humanistic flexibility of archival value interpretation. Archival management can help realize the whole process management of digital humanities resource objects and guarantee the integrity and usability of digital resources; maintaining contextual relatedness can help build resource trust and expand the value space of digital humanities. Digital memory is a new form of memory in the digital era, reflecting the integration and symbiosis of archives and digital humanities in the humanities-memory dimension and the digital-narrative dimension. Observing the mutual conceptual understanding and value significance of archives and digital humanities from a bidirectional examination, and analyzing the practical path of their mutual construction, can help promote the disciplinary dialogue between archives and digital humanities, and facilitate the development of the discipline.

引用格式

曲春梅,何紫璇. 概念、意义与实践：档案与数字人文的双向考察[J]. 档案学研究, 2022, 36(6): 10-17.

Chunmei QU,Zixuan HE. Conception, Significance and Practice: A Bidirectional Examination of Archives and Digital Humanities. Archives Science Study, 2022, 36(6): 10-17.

参考文献

展开查看参考文献（50 条）

[1] 王晓光. “数字人文”的产生、发展与前沿[M]// 全国高校社会科学科研管理研究会. 方法创新与哲学社会科学发展. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2010:207-221. [2] 光明日报理论部,学术月刊编辑部,中国人民大学书报资料中心. 2018年度中国十大学术热点[EB/OL].[2022-01-05]. https://news.gmw.cn/2019-01/11/content_32334236.htm. [3] 陈静. 历史与争论—英美“数字人文”发展综述[J]. 文化研究, 2013(4):206-221. [4] 加小双. 档案学与数字人文:档案观的脱节与共生[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2019(5):10-16. [5] Princeton Prosody Archive[EB/OL].[2022-05-08]. https://prosody.princeton.edu/. [6] Rossetti Archive[EB/OL].[2022-05-08]. http://www.rossettiarchive.org/. [7] Eduardo Urbina,Fernando González Moreno. Visualizing the Quixote:a digital humanities archive for research and teaching[C]//Valencia, Spain:INTED2012 Proceedings.Iated, 2012:6237-6245. [8] Michael J. Kramer. Going meta on metadata[J/OL].[2022-05-10]. Journal of Digital Humanities, 2014, 3(2). http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/3-2/going-meta-on-metadata/. [9] Kate Theimer. Archives in context and as context[J/OL]. Journal of Digital Humanities, 2012(2)[2022-05-10]. http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-2/archives-in-context-and-as-context-by-kate-theimer/. [10] Kenneth M. Price. Edition,project,database,archive, thematic research collection:what's in a name?[J/OL]. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 2009(3)[2022-05-10]. http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/3/3/000053/000053.html. [11] [法] 米歇尔·福柯. 知识考古学[M]. 谢强,马月,译. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2003:143. [12] Jacques Derrida. Archive fever:a freudian impression[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995:90. [13] Marlene Manoff. Archive and database as metaphor: theorizing the historical record[J]. Portal:Libraries and the Academy, 2010(4):385-398. [14] Marlene Manoff. Theories of the archive from across the disciplines[J]. Portal:Libraries and the Academy, 2004(1):9-25. [15] Matthew J. Gorzalski. Archivists and thespians:acasestudy and reflections on context and authenticity in a digitization project[J]. The American Archivist, 2016(1):161-185. [16] Heather MacNeil. Trust and professional identity:narratives,counter-narratives and lingering ambiguities[J]. Archival science, 2011(3/4):175-192. [17] Ed Folsom. Database as genre:the epic transformation of archives[J]. PMLA, 2007(5):1571-1579. [18] Sarah Buchanan. Accessioning the digital humanities: report from the 1st archival education and research institute[J/OL]. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 2010(1)[2022-06-11]. http://digitalhumanities.org:8081/dhq/vol/4/1/000084/000084.html. [19] [43][52] 冯惠玲. 数字人文视角下的数字记忆—兼议数字记忆的方法特点[J]. 数字人文研究, 2021(1):87-95. [20] 牛力, 刘慧琳, 曾静怡. 档案工作参与数字人文建设的模式分析[J]. 档案学通讯, 2020(5):62-67. [21] 周林兴, 崔云萍. 面向数字人文的乡村档案记忆资源开发:价值、机制及路径选择[J]. 北京档案, 2021(10):10-14. [22] [25] 左娜, 张卫东. 理论旅行视角下的我国档案数字人文研究体系重构与话语归置[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2021(12):104-112. [23] [27] 靳文君. 基于数字人文的档案资源开发利用研究[J]. 档案与建设, 2021(4):12-16,11. [24] [28] Arjun Sabharwal. Digital humanities and the emerging framework for digital curation[J]. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 2017(2-4):238-256. [25] 李子林, 王玉珏, 龙家庆. 档案与数字人文的“和”与“合”—国外开展档案数字人文项目的实践[N]. 中国档案报,2018-10-15(3). [26] Heikki Rantala, Ilkka Jokipii, Esko Ikkala, et al. WarVictimSampo 1914-1922:anational war memorial on the semantic web for digital humanities research and applications[J]. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 2022(1):1-18. [27] Tudor Networks[EB/OL].[2022-05-12]. http://tudornetworks.net. [28] Fontane VR[EB/OL].[2022-05-12]. https://www.fontanearchiv.de/forschung/tfalab/fontanevr. [29] Diana E. Marsh, Ricardo L. Punzalan, Robert Leopold, et al. Stories of impact:the role of narrative in understanding the value and impact of digital collections[J]. Archival science, 2016(4):1-46. [30] 张斌, 李子林. 图档博机构“数字叙事驱动型”馆藏利用模型[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2021(5):10. [31] Lucia Garcia-Lorenzo. Framing Uncertainty:narratives, change and digital technologies[J]. Social Science Information, 2010(3):329-350. [32] 王晓光, 谭旭, 夏生平. 敦煌智慧数据研究与实践[J]. 数字人文, 2020(4):11-23. [33] Maria José Vicentini Jorente. Archives information publishing new design in post-custodial regime:the national archives experience digital vaults[J]. Information Services and Use, 2011(3/4):147-155. [34] James Smithies, Carina Westling, Anna-Maria Sichani, et al. Managing 100 digital humanities projects:digital scholarship &archiving in King's Digital Lab[J/OL]. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 2019(1)[2022-05-12]. http://digitalhumanities.org:8081/dhq/vol/13/1/000411/000411.html. [35] Alex H. Poole, Deborah A. Garwood.''Natural Allies'': librarians,archivists,and big data in international digital humanities project work[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2018(4):804-826. [36] Joyce M. Ray. Introduction to research data management[M]. In: Joyce M. Ray(ed). Research Data Management:Practical Strategies for Information Professionals. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press, 2014:1-23. [37] Alessandro Duranti, Charles Goodwin. An introduction[M]// Rethinking context:language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992:1-42. [38] Danielle Mihram, Curtis Fletcher. USC Digital Voltaire: centering digital humanities in the traditions of library and archival science[J]. Portal:Libraries and the Academy, 2019(1):7-17. [39] 赵生辉. 国外档案领域数字人文项目的实践与启示[J]. 浙江档案, 2015(9):14-17. [40] 丁华东, 张燕. 论档案学的三大研究取向及其当代发展[J]. 档案学通讯, 2019(6):4-10. [41] [法] 皮埃尔·诺拉. 记忆与历史之间:场所问题[M]// 皮埃尔·诺拉. 记忆之场:法国国民意识的文化社会史. 黄艳红,等,译. 南京:南京大学出版社, 2015:3-28. [42] [德] 扬·阿斯曼. 交往记忆与文化记忆[M]// 阿斯特莉特·埃尔安, 斯加尔·纽宁. 文化记忆研究指南. 李恭忠,李霞,译. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2021:139. [43] [德] 阿莱达·阿斯曼. 经典与档案[M]// 阿斯特莉特·埃尔安, 斯加尔·纽宁. 文化记忆研究指南. 李恭忠,李霞,译. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2021:131. [44] The digital humanities manifesto 2.0[EB/OL].[2022-05-12]. http://humanitiesblast.com/manifesto/Manifesto_V2.pdf. [45] 刘越男, 杨建梁, 何思源, 等. 计算档案学:档案学科的新发展[J]. 图书情报知识, 2021(3):4-13. [46] Carolyn Heald. Is there room for archives in the postmodern world?[J]. The American Archivist, 1996(1):88-101. [47] 记忆高迁[EB/OL].[2022-05-26]. http://gqjy.bjjy.cn/. [48] 周耀林, 刘晗. 数字记忆建构:缘起、理论与方法[J]. 山东社会科学, 2020(8):50-59. [49] 连志英. 一种新范式:文件连续体理论的发展及应用[J]. 档案学研究, 2018(1):14-21. [50] 曾军. 数字人文的人文之维[N]. 中国社会科学报,2020-08-28(8).

学会介绍

学会资讯

会员服务

学术资源

兰台立方

概念、意义与实践：档案与数字人文的双向考察