档案行政管理2022年第36卷第1期《档案学研究》

论档案问责的解构与机制重构

Deconstruction and Mechanism Reconstruction of Archives Accountability

胡洪彬

Hu Hongbin

浙江财经大学 杭州 310018

出版日期2022-02-28卷期第36卷 第1期页码58-65DOI10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2022.01.008

摘要

档案问责的科学化是推进档案工作现代化的题中应有之义,也是有效压实档案工作主体责任的现实保障。档案问责的有效和有序展开,应基于档案问责的主客体、情形及其程序的整体框架,对其内在的运作逻辑作出系统性的明确。党的十八大以来,我国档案问责不断走向成熟,但其在具体运行中依然存在协调性、规范性和常态性不足的现实弊端。当前,应通过形成更加全面和深入的多元协同机制、覆盖关照机制、程序操作机制、信息发布机制和理念引导机制,推动档案问责实现科学重构,为推动新时代我国档案管理事业发展奠定更加坚实的根基。

关键词:档案问责档案管理档案工作机制重构

Abstract

The scientization of archives accountability is an important part of the modernization of archives management, and it is also a practical guarantee for the effective compaction of the main responsibility of archives work. The effective and orderly development of archives accountability should be based on the overall framework of the subject, object, situation and procedure of archives accountability, and its internal operating logic should be systematically clarified. In recent years, the accountability of archives has continued to mature, but there are still practical disadvantages of insufficient coordination, standardization and normality in its specific operations. At present, multiple coordination mechanisms, coverage and care mechanisms, procedural operation mechanisms, information release mechanisms, and concept guidance mechanisms should be formed to promote the reconstruction of archives accountability, so as to lay a more solid foundation for the development of archives management in the new era.

Key words: archives accountability; archives management; archives work; mechanism reconstruction

引用格式

胡洪彬. 论档案问责的解构与机制重构[J]. 档案学研究, 2022, 36(1): 58-65.
Hu Hongbin. Deconstruction and Mechanism Reconstruction of Archives Accountability. Archives Science Study, 2022, 36(1): 58-65.

参考文献

展开查看参考文献(29 条)
[1] 习近平关于档案工作的讲话[EB/OL]. [2021-03-04]. http://www.zjda.gov.cn/art/2017/8/22/art_1380934_12555063.html. [2] 中华人民共和国档案法[J]. 档案天地, 2020(7):11-15. [3] 贺军. 档案开放程序规制问责探析[J]. 档案学通讯, 2017(6):45-49. [4] 周林兴, 邹莎, 周丽. 信息治理视域下档案服务质量优化控制问责体系构建[J]. 兰台世界, 2019(3):24-28. [5] [28] 吴风敏, 张徐驰. 强化档案行政问责制,打造档案行政部门新形象[J]. 云南档案, 2009(1):7-8. [6] 李扬新. 档案开放责任机制建立的政策设计[J]. 档案学通讯, 2012(2):40-44. [7] 谭燕萍. 档案安全风险评估的成效、问题与对策[J]. 档案, 2016(12):19-21. [8] 付苑. 档案与社会正义:国外档案伦理研究的新进展[J]. 档案学通讯, 2014(4):4-9. [9] 王若磊. 问责的概念与模式[J]. 理论界, 2012(7):17-20. [10] Rob Gray. Thirty Years of Social Accounting,Reporting and Auditing:What(if Anything)Have We Learnt[J]. Business Ethics:A European Review, 2001(1):9-15. [11] Stuart M. Cooper, David L. Owen. Corporate Social Reporting and Stakeholder Accountability:The Missing Link[J]. Accounting,Organizations and society, 2007(7-8):649-667. [12] 张芳山. 关于行政问责法制化的几点思考[J]. 云南行政学院学报, 2008(1):99-102. [13] 王义. 西方新公共管理概论[M]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学出版社, 2006: 70. [14] 周林兴. 公共文化服务体系建设进程中的公共档案馆职责研究[J]. 档案学研究, 2011(5):49-52. [15] 胡燕杨, 桂明. 从“顾客”到“参与者与建设者—关注档案公共服务语境下档案馆公众角色的定位[J]. 档案学通讯, 2017(6):81-85. [16] 俞可平. 善治与幸福[J]. 马克思主义与现实, 2011(2):1-3. [17] 杨鹏. 善治视域下我国档案治理路径探析[J]. 浙江档案, 2019(10):28-30. [18] 陈建. 论权力与档案管理的相互建构[J]. 档案管理, 2017(2):8-10. [19] 中共中央文献研究室. 邓小平年谱:1975—1997[M]. 北京: 中央文献出版社, 2004: 994. [20] [21] 吴建华, 高胜楠. 论新时代档案工作的主要矛盾[J]. 档案学通讯, 2018(5):4-8. [21] Helen R Abadiano, Jesse P Turner, Lynda M Valerie. Common Core State Standards:Towards a Cohesive Accountability System[J]. New England Reading Association Journal, 2013(2):3-5. [22] Andrea Cornwall, Henry Lucas, Kath Pasteur. Introduction:Accountability Through Participation:Developing Workable Partnership Models in the Health Sector[J]. IDS Bulletin(Institute of Development Studies), 2000(1):1-13. [23] 广东省各级各类档案局(馆)档案安全问责试行办法[J]. 广东档案, 2011(6):15-16. [24] 廖军. 重庆荣昌区强化档案安全责任严肃问责机制[N]. 中国档案报, 2017-10-09(2). [25] 随州通报3起落实全面从严治党主体责任不力典型案件[EB/OL]. [2021-02-25]. http://www.hbjwjc.gov.cn/pgs/98794.htm. [26] 廉政君. 仝卓事件起底[J]. 廉政仝望, 2020(12):36-37. [27] 王希鹏. 用问责把责任压下去[N]. 中国纪检监察报, 2015-04-15(6). [28] 陈霞. 基于全过程管理的档案业务流程重组[J]. 兰台世界, 2019(4):40-42. [29] North D. Institutions,Institutional Change and Economic Performance[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990: 35.