基础理论研究2017年第31卷第3期《档案学研究》

中国古代档案管理中存在明确的档案原件意识——以宋代为中心兼与蒋卫荣先生商榷[11]

The Notion of Original is Clearly Existed in Chinese Ancient Archival Management ——Focusing on the Song Dynasty and also Discussing with Mr. JIANG Weirong

钟文荣

Wenrong ZHONG

福建师范大学社会历史学院福州 350007

出版日期2017-06-28卷期第31卷第3期页码17-21DOI10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2017.03.003浏览次数0 次

查看 HTML 全文下载 PDF 全文期刊原文页

摘要

通过对宋代相关文献的分析,我们认为：宋代档案原件意识是明确的,在多数场合下都是受到重视和强调的。首先,这一意识表现为宋代档案工作中存在与“原件”相关的名词,这些名词分别是：“元本”“正本”“底本”及“真本”。其次,这一意识表现为在宋代档案工作中皇命文书和官文书都需按要求保管原件。最后,这一意识表现为档案原件在信息的核验、诉讼和国土争端得以广泛利用并发挥着证据价值。以宋代相关史实为基础,进而我们相信传统档案管理中“档案原件”意识的确立时间应大大早于已有研究者所提出的“近代以后”。

关键词：档案原件宋代正本

Abstract

According to the analysis on the relative documents of the Song dynasty,we believe that the notion of archival original in the Song dynasty was concrete, and it was specially emphasized in most cases. Firstly,the notion embodied that some words had existed in archival work which were connected with the meaning of the original,those were“original copy”,“reserved copy”,“master copy”and“true copy”. Secondly,the notion embodied that all the records should be preserved the original in the archives of Song dynasty, including the emperor’s records and the official records. Lastly, the notion embodied that the records kept in archives were widely used in information examination,in trail and in the conflict of territory. On the basis of all mentioned above,we also make a conclusion that the creating time of the notion of the original should be more earlier than the time which some researcher has put forward “modern times later”.

Key words: a rchival original; the Song Dynasty; reserved copy

引用格式

钟文荣. 中国古代档案管理中存在明确的档案原件意识——以宋代为中心兼与蒋卫荣先生商榷 [11] [J]. 档案学研究, 2017, 31(3): 17-21.

Wenrong ZHONG. The Notion of Original is Clearly Existed in Chinese Ancient Archival Management ——Focusing on the Song Dynasty and also Discussing with Mr. JIANG Weirong. Archives Science Study, 2017, 31(3): 17-21.

参考文献

展开查看参考文献（46 条）

[1] 蒋卫荣.历史上档案管理目标价值与原件概念衍变[J].档案学研究,2014(5):25,24. [2] 蒋卫荣.历史上档案管理目标价值与原件概念衍变[J].档案学研究,2014(5):25,24. [3] 徐松. 宋会要辑稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014:3081,8329,8329,3251,3409,6216,7464,6106,5944,8936,3242-3243. [4] 许慎. 说文解字[M].北京:中华书局,2013:1. [5] 戴侗. 六书故[M].北京:中华书局,2012:3,158. [6] 徐松. 宋会要辑稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014:3081,8329,8329,3251,3409,6216,7464,6106,5944,8936,3242-3243. [7] 李焘.续资治通鉴长编[M].北京:中华书局,1995:4486,9831,9931,3156-3157,10041,817. [8] 李心传. 建炎以来系年要录[M].影印文渊阁四库全书本.台北:台湾商务印书馆,1983:883. [9] 李焘.续资治通鉴长编[M].北京:中华书局,1995:4486,9831,9931,3156-3157,10041,817. [10] 李焘.续资治通鉴长编[M].北京:中华书局,1995:4486,9831,9931,3156-3157,10041,817. [11] 李焘.续资治通鉴长编[M].北京:中华书局,1995:4486,9831,9931,3156-3157,10041,817. [12] 岳珂,王曾瑜校注.鄂国金佗稡编校注[M].北京:中华书局,1989:1123 [13] 周必大. 文忠集[M].影印文渊阁四库全书本.台北:台湾商务印书馆,1983:135. [14] 戴侗. 六书故[M].北京:中华书局,2012:3,158. [15] 徐松. 宋会要辑稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014:3081,8329,8329,3251,3409,6216,7464,6106,5944,8936,3242-3243. [16] 徐松. 宋会要辑稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014:3081,8329,8329,3251,3409,6216,7464,6106,5944,8936,3242-3243. [17] 李焘.续资治通鉴长编[M].北京:中华书局,1995:4486,9831,9931,3156-3157,10041,817. [18] 谢深甫. 庆元条法事类[M].续修四库全书本.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995:304,290,290,290,306,305. [19] 龚延明. 宋代官制辞典[M].北京:中华书局,1997:88. [20] 李元弼. 作邑自箴[M].续修四库全书本.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995:141,148. [21] 李元弼. 作邑自箴[M].续修四库全书本.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995:141,148. [22] 谢深甫. 庆元条法事类[M].续修四库全书本.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995:304,290,290,290,306,305. [23] 谢深甫. 庆元条法事类[M].续修四库全书本.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995:304,290,290,290,306,305. [24] 谢深甫. 庆元条法事类[M].续修四库全书本.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995:304,290,290,290,306,305. [25] 王金玉. 宋代档案管理研究[M].北京:中国档案出版社,1997:105. [26] 徐松. 宋会要辑稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014:3081,8329,8329,3251,3409,6216,7464,6106,5944,8936,3242-3243. [27] 谢深甫. 庆元条法事类[M].续修四库全书本.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995:304,290,290,290,306,305. [28] 徐松. 宋会要辑稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014:3081,8329,8329,3251,3409,6216,7464,6106,5944,8936,3242-3243. [29] 谢深甫. 庆元条法事类[M].续修四库全书本.上海:上海古籍出版社,1995:304,290,290,290,306,305. [30] 李焘.续资治通鉴长编[M].北京:中华书局,1995:4486,9831,9931,3156-3157,10041,817. [31] 徐松. 宋会要辑稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014:3081,8329,8329,3251,3409,6216,7464,6106,5944,8936,3242-3243. [32] 徐松. 宋会要辑稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014:3081,8329,8329,3251,3409,6216,7464,6106,5944,8936,3242-3243. [33] 徐松. 宋会要辑稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014:3081,8329,8329,3251,3409,6216,7464,6106,5944,8936,3242-3243. [34] 徐松. 宋会要辑稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014:3081,8329,8329,3251,3409,6216,7464,6106,5944,8936,3242-3243. [35] 徐松. 宋会要辑稿[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2014:3081,8329,8329,3251,3409,6216,7464,6106,5944,8936,3242-3243. [36] 佚名.名公书判清明集[M].北京:中华书局,1987:85,102,115,154,155. [37] 佚名.名公书判清明集[M].北京:中华书局,1987:85,102,115,154,155. [38] 佚名.名公书判清明集[M].北京:中华书局,1987:85,102,115,154,155. [39] 佚名.名公书判清明集[M].北京:中华书局,1987:85,102,115,154,155. [40] 佚名.名公书判清明集[M].北京:中华书局,1987:85,102,115,154,155. [41] 王铚. 默记[M].北京:中华书局,1981:14. [42] 王铚. 默记[M].北京:中华书局,1981:14. [43] 叶隆礼. 契丹国志[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1985:90. [44] 叶隆礼. 契丹国志[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1985:90. [45] 郑玄,贾公彦.周礼注疏[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1990:517,533. [46] 郑玄,贾公彦.周礼注疏[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1990:517,533.