关怀版

档案资源建设2015年第29卷第3期《档案学研究》

档案鉴定工作几个问题的重新思考

Rethinking about Several Questions on Archival Appraisal

刘晓春, 王雁

Xiaochun Liu, Yan Wang

湖北省档案局 武汉 430071

出版日期2015-06-28卷期第29卷 第3期页码28-32DOI10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2015.03.006浏览次数0

摘要

本文针对“档案鉴定”这个老生常谈的话题,就其中的档案价值鉴定、开放鉴定、数字化鉴定等进行了积极的探索和理性思考。针对档案保管期限,建议将一直以来实行的“三分法”改为永久和定期10年“两分法”;针对档案存毁鉴定,主张对经鉴定拟剔除的档案原则上不销毁,可考虑其直接进入文物市场流通;针对档案的开放鉴定,建议应与政府信息公开条例接轨,取消30年禁锢期限,可将档案分为主动公开的、依申请公开的、不予公开的三类;针对档案数字化鉴定,提出档案数字化的根本目的是方便利用,应将扫描对象区分为扫描件和不扫描件,以剔除冗余信息,节约成本并提高工作效率。一己之见,期作引玉之“砖”。

关键词:档案鉴定工作思考

Abstract

This paper is actively exploring and rationally thinking on archival value appraisal,open access identification and identification for digitization. For the archival retention period,the Tripartite Division method that has been implemented should be changed into the Dichotomy Method,the permanent and regular 10 years. For the identification of preserving archives or destroying,the archives identified to be destroyed could be considered to enter the cultural relics market rather than being destroyed forthwith. For the open access identification of archives,it should be in line with the Decree of Government Information Openness. For the archival digitization identification,the convenience of use is the fundamental purpose of digitizing archives. So the archives should be divided into the scanning or not scanning,in order to eliminate the redundant information,save the cost and improve the work efficiency.

Key words: Archives; Appraisal; Thinking

引用格式

刘晓春, 王雁. 档案鉴定工作几个问题的重新思考[J]. 档案学研究, 2015, 29(3): 28-32.
Xiaochun Liu, Yan Wang. Rethinking about Several Questions on Archival Appraisal. Archives Science Study, 2015, 29(3): 28-32.

参考文献

展开查看参考文献(1 条)
[1] 吴绪成,刘晓春,王郁萍.馆藏档案存“毁”鉴定后的处置与出路[J].中国档案,2007(6).