档案信息化2025年第39卷第5期《档案学研究》

面向单套制的电子档案可信管理内涵与策略探析

The Connotation and Strategies of Trustworthy Management of Electronic Records For Single-set Digital Archiving System

徐红霞, 牛力

XU Hongxia, NIU Li

1 北京石油化工学院人文社科学院 北京 102617 2 中国人民大学信息资源管理学院 北京 100872

出版日期2025-10-28卷期第39卷 第5期页码100-106DOI10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2025.05.012通讯作者牛力

摘要

电子档案面临深刻的信任危机,具体表现为篡改、损毁、伪造、泄密等问题,单套制也要求实现电子档案可信管理。为回应电子档案可信管理现实需求,基于数字信任体系,提出电子档案可信管理包括主体可信、活动可信、客体可信,并从新时代的新变化出发,分析了电子档案可信管理的构成要素。主体可信表现为动态多元主体可信,包括身份可确认、行为可确认及持续信任;活动可信表现为连续非线性活动可信,包括活动合规可追溯、活动全程连续互信、活动执行环境 安全;客体可信表现为动态关联客体可信,包括要素合规、要素安全一致、要素完整互信。以可信构成要素为依据,论述了基于认证技术、形成技术、校验技术、监控技术、安全技术、存储技术、AI技术的技术面向策略,提出了主体权责 规范、全程连续管理规范、多元要素关联互信规范等制度重构策略。

关键词:档案可信管理数字信任体系单套制技术制度

Abstract

Electronic records are facing a profound crisis of trust, specifically manifested in issues such as tampering, damage, forgery, and information leakage. Single-set digital archiving system also requires the realization of trustworthy management of electronic records. To address the practical needs for trustworthy management of electronic records, based on the digital trust system, the connotation of trustworthy management of electronic archives is proposed, which includes trustworthy subjects, trustworthy activities, and trustworthy objects. The trustworthiness of subjects is characterized by dynamic and diverse subject trustworthiness, including verifiable identity, verifiable behavior, and sustained trust. The trustworthiness of activities is characterized by continuous and non-linear activity trustworthiness, including compliance of activities, continuous mutual trust throughout the entire process, and a secure execution environment. The trustworthiness of objects is characterized by the trustworthiness of dynamic and interrelated elements, including compliance of elements, security and consistency, and integrity and mutual trust. Based on the trustworthy elements, this paper discussed the technical strategies based on the new generation of trust technology, which includes identity authentication technology, formation technology, verification technology, monitoring technology, security technology, storage technology and so on. It also discussed the institutional strategies, which includes the regulation of subject rights and responsibilities, the regulation of the entire process management, and the regulation of element interrelation and mutual trust.

Key words: trustworthy archive management; digital trust framework; single-set digital archiving system; technology; institution

引用格式

徐红霞, 牛力. 面向单套制的电子档案可信管理内涵与策略探析[J]. 档案学研究, 2025, 39(5): 100-106.
XU Hongxia, NIU Li. The Connotation and Strategies of Trustworthy Management of Electronic Records For Single-set Digital Archiving System. Archives Science Study, 2025, 39(5): 100-106.

参考文献

展开查看参考文献(15 条)
[1] [2][21] 于英香, 张期勇. 从制度信任到技术信任:档案信任机制的变迁与发展[J]. 浙江档案, 2022(12):30-33. [2] 王平, 李沐妍, 刘晓春. 区块链视角下文件档案管理可信生态的构建[J]. 档案学研究, 2020(4):115-121. [3] 张雅君. 可信电子文件与电子文件可信管理[J]. 兰台世界, 2015(11):16-17. [4] [10] 汪海英. 基于区块链探讨文档数据档案管理可信生态的构建路径[J]. 中国管理信息化, 2021(22):210-211. [5] [19][20] 许晓彤. 电子档案凭证价值保障需求研究—基于电子证据审查判断的视角[J]. 档案与建设, 2021(7):14-19,13. [6] [9] 许晓彤. 组织机构电子文件证据效力保障研究[J]. 档案学通讯, 2020(6):109-112. [7] [12] 毕建新, 余雪, 余亚荣, 等. 电子档案可信存储与验证体系研究[J]. 档案学研究, 2023(3):119-126. [8] 向梦, 向禹. 国内电子文件可信管理研究评述[J]. 山西档案, 2022(3):168-176. [9] 毕建新, 邬静娴, 余亚荣, 等. 面向证据效力维护的电子档案可信管理探析[J]. 档案学通讯, 2023(6):78-85. [10] [16][17][22] 朱佳丽, 李涵昱, 钱力, 等. 可信数字学术的涵义及实现框架研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2024(5):102-113. [11] 连志英, 蒋玲, 张晓. 档案来源观的后现代转向[J]. 档案学通讯, 2023(5):4-10. [12] 张衍, 黄清晨. 后保管理论与文件连续体理论关系的重新审视[J]. 档案学研究, 2020(1):25-31. [13] 杨晶晶. 企业档案数据质量管理若干要务[J]. 浙江档案, 2021(1):60-61. [14] 盛明科, 贺清波. 数字技术治理风险的生成与防治路径探析—以技术与制度互构论为视角[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023(2):16-23. [15] 广东规范政务服务事项电子文件归档管理[EB/OL].[2024-12-19]. https://www.saac.gov.cn/daj/c100238/202107/15b41ee657e14c2491f0c3bbbf8df571.shtml.